Brazil (BR)
09-27-2012 (Newsletter Issue 14/12)
Similar and Generic Veterinary Medicines Introduced
The Law No. 12.689/2012 introduces two new modalities of veterinary medicines: the similar and the generic ones. The Law is effective as of October 17, 2012.
The similar and generic veterinary medicines can only be produced after the expiration of the patent of the reference veterinary medicine, so as not to infringe the rights of the patent owner, whether a product or a process.
Similar veterinary medicines must bear the owner's trade name or the trademark and should contain the same active principle, pharmaceutical concentration and form as the reference medicine.
Generic veterinary medicines must be designated by the Brazilian Common Denomination (DCB) or by the International Nonproprietary Name (DCI). They must contain the same active ingredient, concentration and form, administration, dosage and therapeutic indication as the reference medicine. Bioequivalence to the reference medicine, its efficacy and safety must be demonstrated by means of pharmaceutical studies with the Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Supply (MAPA).
Rights that may not be protected by a patent, but which allow the exclusive ownership, such as those that grant the exclusive right to use the clinical trials and related dossiers (data protection) provided by Brazilian Law 10,603/2002, should be taken into consideration, for they could eventually delay the launching of some similar and generic veterinary medicine in the market.
MAPA shall shortly publish an ordinance in order to regulate the simplified proceeding of registration of the generic veterinary medicines.
Source: Di Blasi, Parente & Associates, Brazil,
Moeller IP Advisors, Argentina
09-27-2012 (Newsletter Issue 14/12)
New Rules on TM Coexistence Agreements
On August 21, 2012, the BPTO published a Normative Legal Opinion (INPI/CPAPD 001/2012) consolidating the view that coexistence agreements are to be taken into consideration as an element for the analysis of applications. While the examiners will not be bound by the consent of the owners of the blocking marks and may therefore reject or confirm the rejection of applications if they consider the marks involved as conflicting, the evidence of a consent will constitute a valuable argument to avoid or challenge a rejection.
This Normative Legal Opinion also contemplates the possibility for the examiners to raise office actions inviting the applicants to adjust the list of products or services envisioned or even introduce modifications in the marks themselves so as to permit their coexistence with the earlier marks cited as obstacles.
This Normative Legal Opinion became effective as of its publication.
Source: Annemann Siemen Bigler & Ipanema Moreira, Brazil
09-02-2012 (Newsletter Issue 13/12)
Code for Numbering Changed
The BPTO has adopted a new numbering code that meets International standards as of the beginning of 2012.
The final number of the applications will be given at the time of the protocol, enabling the holder’s effective monitoring.
The new numbering follows the following standards:
BR ZZ XXXX YYYYYY K
BR = Code of country (Brazil)
ZZ = Nature of protection
XXXX = Year of filing at BPO
YYYYYY = Number related to the order of filing of applications
K = Check digit of the number of application
The numbers related to the nature of protection as applied as follow:
Patents
ZZ = 10 for first filing or applications claiming foreign priority under Paris Union Convention;
ZZ = 11 for entering into the Brazilian national phase of PCT applications;
ZZ = 12 for divisional patent applications; and
ZZ = 13 for certificates of addition.
Utility models
ZZ = 20 for first filing or applications claiming foreign priority under Paris Union Convention;
ZZ = 21 for entering into the Brazilian national phase of PCT applications; and
ZZ = 22 for divisional applications
Industrial Designs
ZZ = 30 for Industrial Design Application;
ZZ = 31 for applications filed under International Treaties; and
ZZ = 32 for divisional applications.
Geographical indication
ZZ = 40 for Indication of Source application;
ZZ = 41 for Designation of Origin applications; and
ZZ = 42 for applications filed under International Treaties; and
ZZ = 43 for divisional applications.
Patent Applications, Utility Models, Industrial Designs and Geographical Indication filed until 31 December 2011 shall not be renumbered.
Source: Moeller IP Advisors, Argentina
01-23-2012 (Newsletter Issue 1/12)E-Tracking of ApplicationsThe Brazilian Patent and Trademark Office (INPI) announced a new software system to speed up and simplify the processing of trademark applications made in paper.
Applicants can track the status of their application ectronically through the entire procedure. Any formal requirements will be published in the Journal of Industrial Property (Revista da Propriedade Industrial), available on INPI’s Portal. The deadline to comply with those formal requirements is five days. If all requirements are fulfilled, the request goes to the technical examination.
For more information, please click hereSource: www.inpi.gov.br 12-05-2011 (Newsletter Issue 14/11)Official Fees to Increase in 2012The Brazilian Patent and Trademark Office (INPI) annouced an average increase of 18.5 % in its official fees including the trademark application fees effective from January 2012.
The official application fees per trademark will be BRL 475.00 (approx. EUR 190.00) in case of paper filing, respectively BRL 355.00 (approx. EUR 143.00) per trademark when filed electronically.
To access the schedule of fees, please click here
Source: www.inpi.gov.br and M.J. Zanon, IP Lawyer, Brazil 10-01-2011 (Newsletter Issue 11/11)
New Version of Electronic Filing System
The Brazilian Trademark Office has recently announced a new enhanced version of the Brazilian Trademark Electronic Filing System (e-marcas 2.0), to be launched on October 3rd, 2011.
The new version is expected to enable a more secure environment (digital certification) for users and a more user-friendly interface with applicants, also helping reduce impaired functioning, which may occur in the current version.
The use of the new system is expected to contribute to the increasing number of applications, which is likely to reach 150,000 this year – a substantial increase of 15% when compared to 2010.
The new version shall also enable the implementation of multiclass applications and co-ownership of trademark registrations, which are relevant steps for the implementation of the Madrid Protocol.
Source: Veirano Advogados, Brazil
04-20-2011 (Newsletter Issue 7/11)
INPI Website Available in English Now
The first page of the official website of the Brazilian National Institute of Industrial Property (INPI) is in English now available.
Source: César A. Leão Barcellos & Cia.Ltd., Brazil
10-08-2009 (Newsletter Issue 3/09)
New Official Fees Bring Important Adjustments
The Brazilian National Institute of Industrial Property (INPI) has made relevant alterations in its official fees, including for trademarks, effective June 1, 2009. The adjustments' aim is to raise funds for its ongoing restructuring and the training of trademark examiners.
The adjustments correspond to a 17 percent overall increase for trademarks. This is even lower than the rate of inflation experienced in Brazil since the INPI’s last fee increase, which was in 2003.
The new schedule of fees clearly stimulates interest in the electronic filing system: Several fees for online services are now, on average, 25 percent cheaper compared to fees for paper filings for the same services. The new fee schedule increases the discount on all official fees charged to small companies, individuals, nonprofit and public entities, to 60 percent from 50 percent.
Legal basis is the new Industrial Property Law, in force since May 15th, 1997. Although Brazil is part of the Paris Convention and the TRIPS agreement, it is not part of the Madrid system.
Trademark protection is obtained by registration. Very limited rights derive from earlier use in commerce and special protection is afforded to well-known marks.
Nice classification, 10th edition
Before January 3rd, 2000, there was a national classification of 35 classes for goods and 6 classes for services (similar to the Nice international classification) each subdivided in local subdivisions. Older registrations that have not been re-classified are still using this national classification.
Registrable as a trademark are all distinctive and graphically representable signs, such as words, names, acronyms, letters, numbers, devices, combination of colors, three-dimensional forms and any combination of the mentioned signs.
The following trademark types are registrable: trade marks, service marks, collective marks and certification marks. They can be presented as word, figurative, combined (word + figure/logo) and three dimensional marks.
The application if filed at the Brazilian Patent and Trademark Office (BPTO).
A separate application has to be filed for each class.
Foreign applicants need a local agent or lawyer.
A simply signed power of attorney suffices for all trademark filings in the name of the same owner. The local representative must be authorized to state that applicant is engaged in the field of commerce or industry related to the products or services claimed in the application.
Foreign applicants do not need a domestic registration nor domestic company incorporation.
The application process includes a formal examination, an examination of distinctiveness and a search for prior trademarks. The processing time from first filing to registration is approx. 3 years.
Prior to registration, the trademark application is published approx. 3 months after the application date in the weekly gazette “Revista da Propriedade Industrial” (RPI).
National:
The opposition period is 60 days from publication date of the application.
After the grant decision it is also possible to file a cancellation action at the BPTO within 180 days from the grant publication.
Opposition against designation of IR Mark
(The period starts from the national publication date, if not stated differently):
not a member of the Madrid Agreement or Protocol.
A trademark registration is valid for 10 years from the date of registration.
The registration is renewable for periods of 10 years.
A TM registration becomes vulnerable to cancellation requests by third parties, with basis on non-use, after the 5th year of registration.
The BPTO official fees for each trademark application are BRL 475 (approx. EUR 190) for paper filing, and BRL 355 (aprox. EUR 145) for e-filings (last updated January 2013).
Trademark Licence Agrreement
In Brazil a licence can be an oral contract but should preferably be in writing. It is permitted to license the use of unregistered trademarks. A licence can be restricted to only some of the goods or services in respect of which the mark is registered. The sale of a registered trademark does not automatically terminate the licence. There are statutory provisions prescribing the terms of licensing. In accordance with Brazil’s Industrial Property Law, the proprietor has the right, but not an obligation to exercise effective control over the specifications, nature and quality of the licensed products and/or services. The licensee must exercise his best efforts to preserve the proprietor’s rights against infringing parties. There are royalty limitations varying according to the product/service.
Recordal
There are provisions in law for the recordal of a licensee with the Trademark Office (BPTO).
Recordal is compulsory to allow the remission of royalties to other countries, legally bind third parties and allow tax deductibility. The Recordal is not required in order to proof use of the mark by the licensee Recordal is only effective after publication.
There is no time frame for a recordal. There is no prescribed form for a licence agreement, but for purposes of recordal it must contain the registration or application number of the licensed mark, state whether sub-licensing is permitted, any royalties and payment conditions and the term of the agreement.
Further documents are required for a recordal:
1. Recordal form and receipt of payment of the BPTO official fee
2. A notarised and legalised power of attorney of the licensor and licensee, with specific powers to accept service of summons in lawsuits that involve the licensor’s intellectual property rights (notarised and legalised up to a Brazilian Consulate)
3. If applicable, details of the corporate relationship between licensor and licensee, including details of stockholders/ shareholders of the companies
4. The signatories to the agreements and any amendments must be identified and qualified. If the documents were signed abroad, the corresponding signatures must be notarised and legalised.
Effectiveness
A licence agreement becomes effective between the parties upon signature, but only becomes enforceable against third parties after publication of the recordal of a licence agreement in the Official Gazette.
Infringement Proceedings
The Brazilian trademark law provides a full range of alternatives for the trademark owner to enforce trademark rights in the territory, including civil and criminal measures, preliminary injunction and relief requests, indemnity and seizure of infringing and counterfeit products. Licensee may join plaintiff in an infringement lawsuit, but can only act solely against infringement if expressly provided in the recorded trademark license.
| Search type |
First class |
Add. class |
| Word Mark Search (availability) |
490,00 € |
310,00 € |
| Word Mark Search (identical) |
340,00 € |
240,00 € |
| Extended Search (word mark, company name, domain) |
710,00 € |
310,00 € |
| Device Mark Search (availability) |
660,00 € |
450,00 € |
| Trademark Owner Search |
290,00 € |
|
| Company Name Search |
300,00 € |
|
| Domain Name Search (extended) |
72,00 € |
|
| i-Search (word mark availability + legal opinion) |
520,00 € |
390,00 € |
The Prices above are S.M.D. Markeur Search Fees
Country Index is a free service of S.M.D. Markeur, an international IP searching and monitoring firm.
We would like to thank the following law firms for their assistance in updating the information provided:
Country Survey01-24-2013
Provedel Avogados, São Paulo, Brazil

05-24-2012
Lia e Barbosa Sociedade de Advogados, Sao Paulo, Brazil
12-09-2011
César A. Leão Barcellos & Cia.Ltd., Porto Allegre City, Brazil
Provedel Avogados, São Paulo, Brazil
Licensing01-24-2013
Provedel Avogados, São Paulo, Brazil

12-09-2011
Assef e Moschetta Advogados, São Paulo, Brazil
César A. Leão Barcellos & Cia.Ltd., Porto Allegre City, Brazil
Provedel Avogados, São Paulo, Brazil
