Select Country

Select a country to view information on local trademark law


Countries
A-E  F-J  K-O  P-T  U-Z

Multinational Agreements
EUIPO  WIPO
AIPO/OAPI  ARIPO
Enter Client Voucher:  info
Search
Trademarks
for Free
+
+
TMZOOM

Get Listed

Promote your expertise to IP professionals worldwide.
read more

Subscribe to Free Newsletter

To keep updated on the latest amendments to international trademark laws click here

Articles

Print this page
Feb 17, 2010
Chris McLeod, Hammonds LLP, UK

Vodka protected by extended passing off


Chris McLeod, Hammonds LLP, UKIn Diageo v Intercontinental Brands, the High Court has ruled on an unusual case of extended passing off.

Background: Extended passing off is where suppliers of goods of a particular description bring a passing off claim to restrain rival traders from using that description, or a confusingly similar term, in relation to goods which do not correspond to that description. On this basis, the courts have prevented terms such as “Spanish champagne”, “sherry” and “Swiss chalet” from being applied to products which were not champagne, sherry from Jerez or Swiss chocolate respectively. The early cases concerned descriptions relating to the geographic origin of goods but the case of Warnink v Townend in 1979 (the ‘advocaat’ case) extended the law to cover descriptions with no geographic element. read more